<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Flash bad for you?</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/08/07/is-flash-bad-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stocklandmartelblog.com/2009/08/07/is-flash-bad-for-you/</link>
	<description>News, commentary, interviews, video, and more from photo agency Stockland Martel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://stocklandmartelblog.com/2009/08/07/is-flash-bad-for-you/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stocklandmartelblog.com/?p=1277#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Exactly what I was thinking.  I&#039;m looking for a new website format (been writing my own site for WAY too long) and the flash front-page is a no-go for me, I want to provide info, not an intro.  

On the other hand, too much info is just plain time consuming!  I think we&#039;ve gone too far with all the social networking, I&#039;m getting burnt out!  

Photographer&#039;s should have one website, as do most of the photographers that work for SM, not a twit-pic page, and iPhone gallery, a flickr, etc.  I think it de-values the imagery when you post too many shots, stating exactly how you shot them, where you shot them, and why.  I like the photogs that leave a little mystery and provide the right amount of &quot;in the know&quot; info.  There is an amazing list of talent streaming from this site, thanks for all the inspiration.  

~Katie W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what I was thinking.  I&#8217;m looking for a new website format (been writing my own site for WAY too long) and the flash front-page is a no-go for me, I want to provide info, not an intro.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, too much info is just plain time consuming!  I think we&#8217;ve gone too far with all the social networking, I&#8217;m getting burnt out!  </p>
<p>Photographer&#8217;s should have one website, as do most of the photographers that work for SM, not a twit-pic page, and iPhone gallery, a flickr, etc.  I think it de-values the imagery when you post too many shots, stating exactly how you shot them, where you shot them, and why.  I like the photogs that leave a little mystery and provide the right amount of &#8220;in the know&#8221; info.  There is an amazing list of talent streaming from this site, thanks for all the inspiration.  </p>
<p>~Katie W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
