“Death by Cat”

Bird6_1copy_1

All photographs by Bruce Wolf.

…..

If you’ve ever owned a cat that had outdoor privileges, you know that they occasionally like to bring home presents. Presents that once were alive. Little beasts that they’ve gone and valiantly slain for you and brought to your doorstep. That’s fine when you have only a cat or two. But when you have almost 40 felines, as Bruce Wolf and his family did when they lived in rural Westchester County, New York, you wind up with heaps and piles of blood-stained presents. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Inspired by the book Sleeping Beauty: Memorial Photography in America, Bruce decided to start photographing his pets’ prizes. Shot on a black background, the tender, partially eviscerated bodies of birds, mice, and even insects have the elevated beauty and rich tones of an Old Masters still life. After he’d amassed a collection of these images, he showed them to Gold Bug Gallery Pasadena, which has a next-door shop that reminded him of the store Evolution. “They have a lot of artists who contribute things that are dark,” he told me last week on the phone from Portland, Oregon, where he is now based.

Starting Thursday, Gold Bug will be exhibiting “Death by Cat,” a show of Bruce’s photographs. In a story published Saturday, the Los Angeles Chronicle called it “a scandalous collection,” which is high praise indeed.

DeathByCat2_1

DeathByCat28_1BlueBirdWing_1

 

…..

Bruce sent me a short essay he wrote about “Death by Cat.” Here it is:

“About 10 years ago, my wife and son decided that our house should be a sanctuary for any cat that needed a home. As we lived in a rural section of Westchester County, N.Y. the cats we took in were able to roam on more than 70 acres of woodlands. They had access to the outdoors and our house 24 hours a day. Some only lived outside, some never ventured out, some only visited the house every few months, some disappeared. At it’s height the cat population hovered around 40 grown cats. A by-product of this “herd” was that almost daily, we found various animals and birds that they killed during the night. Although this was a problem for us, we knew that this is what cats do for a living, it was part of Nature. We kept the cats well fed and saved any animal that was alive, but we wound up disposing of many, many more dead critters.

Over the course of my career as a Commercial Photographer, I became familiar with a book of Victorian era photographs, called, Sleeping Beauties. Photography was still in it’s infancy in Victorian times and it was extremely rare for the average person to be photographed. As this new technology of photography spread, people soon started having recently deceased relatives photographed as a way of preserving their image and memory. Whether this was promoted by certain early professional photographers is not known, but knowing photographers as I do, it probably was. The photographs in this book are of people posed to be as lifelike as possible and restored, when they died through a violent act or accident. Of course the success of this restoration varied considerably. The images are very powerful.

As I continually disposed of these dead animals, I remembered this book and decided to photograph these animals, in the condition I found them. It was sort of a memorial to the animal. To connect to the Victorian photographs I chose to have all the images on a black background. I did little to “pose” the bodies and hence some are like animal studies, some are comic, some are gruesome, and some reveal the fear and the violence of the death. No matter what the animal, I tried to maintain a certain elegance and dignity in the images. After more than six years of preparing these photographs, this is the first time I am showing them in public.”

For directions and gallery hours, please visit Gold Bug’s website.

Behind the scenes of those “Trauma” ads

You know those ads for Trauma that I mentioned recently? The ones singled out by The Hollywood Reporter as being among the best TV ads of the new season? The ones that The New York Observer has called “the snazziest ad campaign of the fall”?

Well, I’ve been trying to get Michael Muller, who shot the ads, to tell me how he did it. I know he was inspired by war photography, but I’m curious which photographers’ work he might have been referencing, and how he directed the actors and chose the scenarios. One of these days I’ll get him on the phone to talk about it. The man is always busy, so it may take some time. Meanwhile, he did send me these behind-the-scenes photos from the shoot.

_MG_9995

_MG_9949

_MG_0001

….

And while we’re talking behind-the-scenes access, Michael has also posted a short documentary on an expedition he took to the Galapagos Archipelago with the Charles Darwin Foundation. (The trip was related to a campaign he shot for IWC, which I wrote about in May.) It’s pretty cool. Actually, it’s really, really cool. Makes me wish I weren’t cuffed to this laptop.

..

Michael Muller’s Entourage with the RED Camera

“Keep the photography simple, and work the print.”

page2_1

The fall edition of Esquire‘s Big Black Book, a men’s style guide with a luxury bent, comes out this month, and John Midgley sent me the tearsheets for a story he shot with Esquire fashion director Nick Sullivan. Called “The Revisionists,” it’s about four designers who have attempted to reinvent the suit for the 21st century. Here’s what John had to say about the shoot:

“It’s a series of 4 pictures shot in a simple portrait-like manner at my home. The idea was to keep the photography simple and in the style of portraiture from the 1920′s and 1930′s, because the clothing was inspired by tailoring from the beginning of the last century.

I have always been inspired by the portraits of August Sander for their seeming simplicity, attention to detail and the way they drew you into the people he was shooting. I used to always shoot on large-format 4×5 and 8×10  cameras, but on this occasion we shot on a 35mm digital camera, which was at odds with both my personal style and the style of photography I had been inspired by for this series.

To be honest, I was nerve-wracked and very unsure I had made the right decision and feared I had taken an easy way out. But when I started working the images in post, I realized that as before when I shot negative, a lot of the work is in the printing and color work. Keep the photography simple, and work the print.

The only thing I need to remember to do is to slow down on the 35mm. It is very tempting to just  press the trigger again and again. Overall, I am happy with the results and love the process.”

page3_1

page4_1page5_1

Michael Muller’s Trauma Trailer

Ruedi Hofmann Film Reel

Jim Fiscus RED camera “Moment” clip, a work in progress

Michael Muller’s Nike “PacMan” clips

Out of the mouths of reps

On Tuesday, I went to a panel discussion led by creative consultant Louisa Curtis that centered on the photo industry from the reps’ perspective. The event was geared toward photographers, so the questions were mostly about how the reps market their agencies and their photographers; what they expect from someone they rep; and the importance of relationships and networking.

The panelists were Neil Binkley of Wonderful Machine, David Laidler of Aurora Select, Frank Meo of Meo Represents, Laura Reid of Redux, Tricia Scott of MergeLeft, Robert Bacall of Robert Bacall Representatives, and Gary Hurewitz of Greenhouse Reps.

For me, these were some of the most interesting points made at the event, which was held at Adorama:


Product photography is going the way of CGI. Robert Bacall noted that still life used to be his bread and butter. Then he gestured to a water bottle at his side and remarked that you might see that bottle in an ad, but it never actually existed—it was all created on the computer.

It’s not enough to shoot great photos. Many of the reps are encouraging their photographers to expand into video. At Stockland Martel, we’ve been referring to our talent as image makers, an intentionally broad term. Bacall uses the term “media solution providers.”

E-blasts are out, and direct mail is back in. Well, that’s how the panelists first explained their take on the efficacy of email marketing. They eventually acknowledged that they all still send out e-blasts, but they weren’t very enthusiastic about them as a marketing tool. Everyone talked about how art buyers and creatives spend half their day just deleting emails from their inbox without reading them because they are overwhelmed. A print piece that shows up in their stack of snail mail, on the other hand, at least guarantees that the recipient will see the image and the name. Gary Hurewitz said he’d all but abandoned e-blasts a couple of years ago, when he noticed that everyone else was doing it. He figured if there were fewer direct-mail pieces going out, then his had a better chance of being seen. Makes sense.

Photographers need to market themselves and not rely on Mommy and Daddy (I mean, their reps) to do it all for them. No further explanation needed on that one…

This is a relationship business, and you have to network. Get out there and make a physical appearance in the photo community, urged Tricia Scott. Facebooking and emailing are not enough; the old-fashioned in-person conversation is still king when it comes to making a solid connection with someone.

Because this is a relationship business, people want to work with photographers they get along with. The reps have a brand they’re trying to protect too (for the benefit of their talent as well as themselves), and it’s just not an option to send out a photographer who’s going to ego-trip his way through a project and irritates the client. That’s why, the panelists explained, when a rep looks at a potential new photographer, they assess not just the work but also the personality behind it.

You have to spend money to make money. A major cliché, I know. But it came up several times. Bacall once ponied up $22,000 to promote a photographer’s baby images. The promo, which was as clever as it was costly, consisted of Fisher Price View Masters for which he had created custom reels of the photographer’s work. A cute way to get potential clients to look at the work while providing a tangible indication of the photographer’s affinity with kids.
..

Louisa tells me that she lists upcoming events in her monthly Chatterbulletin, which she archives at her blog.

..

Some of our readers’ workspaces

Last week, I wrote about the workspaces of the creative and solitary (is that redundant? Creative and solitary?), and I invited readers to submit photos of their own design/photo/art headquarters. Here are a couple, for your voyeuristic viewing pleasure. (I’m happy to keep posting these images, by the way. You’ll find me at [email protected].)

From Alan Gastelum here in New York:

“Love the post! Would love to see some of the SM photographers desks :) My isn’t that fancy, but here it is…”

20090925_life_0097

And from Michael Clinard in Seattle:

clinard_studio_wall

“Super huge fan of ye olde Stockland Martel blog, and the photographers you guys rep. Saw the post about studio environs and remembered I’d taken a shot of my own over here in Magnuson Park, Seattle. My workspace is in an old naval brig, so large window/high ceilings. . . what else could I need?

A bit of backstory on what’s going on here: I’m a child of art school–who now works in commercial photography–so a lot of what is on the wall there is the residue of my march through that and what informs my work now. There is a still from a student film where I’d played Professor Bopp (of Hale-Bopp lore), preparatory sketches for a few conceptual drawings involving percentages, a self-portrait entitled ‘something rotten in the state of denmark,’ a piece of C (chromogenic) paper exposed to light for five months (long story), an old baby picture, the work of friends, etc.

As I sit here and compose this message, I often look up and remember the path which led me to the very spot I sit in right now.”

Thanks for sending me your stuff, guys.

….