Highlights from last night’s APA/NY Image Makers series with Robert Tardio and Jeff Mermelstein

I went to the Apple store in Soho last night to hear Robert Tardio and Jeff Mermelstein speak at the APA/NY Image Makers series. Here are some highlights and sound bites from their presentations.

.
.

Robert Tardio
Robert is a commercial still-life photographer with 24 years in the industry who is collaborating on an upcoming book with stylist Lloyd Boston. He talked about “Finding Beauty in Everyday Objects.” Some of Robert’s commercial work:

.

.

.

On still-life photographers
“We’re a peculiar bunch. We’re compulsive, detail-oriented, and perhaps more comfortable with things than with people.”
.

On still-life photography
Unlike with other genres, “events are not unfolding in front of the camera—you are staging events.” I thought it was interesting that he thinks of still lifes as events. It suggests thinking in terms of narrative, even if that narrative is simply a story about forms.

.
On the ever-growing legions of amateur photographers
“‘Good enough for the Web’ has become the order of the day,” Robert said. But what separates the pros from the amateurs is “an understanding of the properties and qualities of light.”

.

On testing
“It’s a great way to show clients how you’re thinking and what you might do for them.” He showed a series he made in which each frame was shot with one object, one light, and a white background. He also showed a series he did of metal objects (metal being notoriously difficult to light) that he bought at the hardware store. Those tests landed him a shoot for Kwikset, which hired him to photograph locks and their various parts.

Some of Robert’s personal work:

.

.

Someone in the audience asked about how he shows tests to clients, wondering if maybe a client would prefer to see only commissioned work. “Most of my portfolio are tests,” Robert replied. “We very rarely have a client that cares if it’s a test or not.” He added that what you want is for the client to hold up your book, point to an image, and say, “Give us that.”

.

.

Jeff Mermelstein

Jeff is an award-winning street photographer (though he prefers to think of it as photojournalism or straight photography), as well as an advertising photographer. His work has been collected in several books, including Sidewalk and the upcoming Twirl/Run. (At Thirteen/WNET’s site, you can go on a photographic tour of the streets with Jeff. Click here to access it.)

Some of Jeff’s work:

.

.

.
On his use of color
“I am not consciously interested in mixing or juxtaposing colors,” he said. “I’m much more interested in color being real—because we see in color.”

.

On Twirl/Run
The book features photos of women twirling their hair. “Books are the greatest vehicle for still-image makers,” he said. He didn’t set out, whoever, to make photos on the theme of hair twirlers. “I think best by not thinking when I’m working,” he explained. But in reviewing his work, he noticed some twirling images. And then he began looking for more such images on the streets. He now has some 200 twirling photos.

.

.

The “run” part of the book is photos of people, mostly men, running. They’re not athletes or joggers—just regular people rushing to get somewhere—and the photos span 15 years. Like the twirling images, he didn’t plan to photograph runners, but he noticed a preponderance of that sort of image when he was looking back at his work.

.

.

“I’m a big fan of keeping all your files,” said Jeff, who shoots film. “How you see things changes.” He noted that you can look at your work in 6 months, 6 years, 16 years and always see something different, or not see something you had observed before.

.

On photographing strangers on the street
Someone in the audience asked Jeff whether he engages with the people he photographs. He seemed to expect the question. His answer, which he encouraged the audience not to take cynically, was, “No. There’s nothing to gain.” He gestured to the screen, where he was showing a photo of a locksmith kneeling on the sidewalk, his forehead pressed to the concrete in prayer. “If this guy looked up and started talking to me, it’s not because he’s into Friedlander.”

.

On doing new work
Jeff ended his presentation with new work: basketball-themed imagery shot in Brooklyn. The project was inspired by plans for the would-be Brooklyn Nets (currently the New Jersey Nets) coming to the neighborhood. “There’s no better feeling for a photographer than new work,” he said as he clicked through his images. “It’s also very scary—especially when you’re showing it.”

.

.

New work: Timothy Greenfield-Sanders and the geeks

“Get your geek on. Support the library.” That’s the message of a new campaign by Leo Burnett in Chicago, which has teamed up with OCLC, a nonprofit library cooperative funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to foster support for public libraries.

The “Geek the Library” campaign features portraits of “geeks” of all stripes, shot last spring by Timothy Greenfield-Sanders. The point of the campaign is that we’re all geeks—we’re all avid about something, and libraries are a place where we can explore our interests to our heart’s content. In Timothy’s portraits, we see people wo are very different from each other in age, background, personality, and ethnicity but who all share one vital quality: passion. I’ve posted some screenshots below; to see all of the portraits, go here.

“Patty Killackey [at Leo Burnett] was in charge and fabulous to work with,” Timothy told me in an email. “I reached out to a few of my friends to sit for the portrait campaign…including Lou Reed, Elvis Mitchell, and Brian Dennehy. We hired Donna Grossman to do the rest of the casting. Everything was shot in film, on my 8×10 view camera. Film was processed at Primary Photographic, and they also did the minimal cleanup and retouching.”

.

The inimitable Lou Reed.

Elvis Mitchell, Timothy's collaborator on "The Black List" project.

Actor Brian Dennehy.


.

.

Roxanne Lowit in Netherlands museum’s “Haute Couture” exhibition

The Gemeente Museum in the Hague is home to one of Europe’s largest fashion collections—from the pink Givenchy frock that Audrey Hepburn made famous in Breakfast at Tiffany’s to pieces from fashion’s storied past, including by Worth, Poiret, and Vionnet. And now, with “Haute Couture,” the museum is celebrating some of fashion’s finest: members of the elite Chambre syndicale de la haute couture.

“Membership of the Chambre syndicale de la haute couture, which was established  in 1868, is an exclusive honour subject to a tough selection procedure and strict rules,” the museum explains at its website. “The designers affiliated to the Chambre are among the best in the world, repeatedly surprising us with their breathtaking creations. This is the world of great names like Dior, Lacroix and Gaultier.”

Roxanne Lowit, of course, has famously documented Dior, and a selection of her photos are featured in the exhibition, which runs through June 6. Here are a couple of shots of her images in the museum’s galleries:

.

 

.

And since the above photos don’t do her work justice, here are some of Roxanne’s Dior images close up:

.

The photos above are from Roxanne's book "Backstage: Dior."

 

.

.

Oprah on her all-time favorite Oprah Magazine cover

O: The Oprah Magazine marks its 10th anniversary this year, an occasion that inspired the entertainment juggernaut to reflect on the many variety of ways in which she has been photographed for the cover.

“Winfrey herself has been on the cover of every issue in the magazine’s history,” notes msnbc.com’s The Scoop. “What did it take to get there? One hundred nineteen outfits, 74 hairstyles and two convertibles, for starters.”

The cover Oprah likes best? August 2004. The photographer? Our own Matthew Rolston.

.

.

“Winfrey said that the August 2004 cover ‘may be my all-time favorite cover: on the beach, with Matthew Rolston’s crew following me with heaters,’” reports msnbc.com.

Matthew, incidentally, has photographed Oprah for the cover a whopping 33 times—more than any other photographer.

For more of Oprah’s cover thoughts, check out the May issue of O.

.

.

Beware of content-aware fill: Stella Kramer on Photoshop CS5

Adobe Photoshop CS5 officially debuts today, and according to PC World, which tested a beta version of the software, “what sets Photoshop CS5 apart isn’t any one killer app but dozens of refinements that will make users’ lives easier, more efficient, and, potentially, more creative.”

One of those refinements is “content-aware fill.”

“One of the biggest requests we get of Photoshop is to make adding, removing, moving or repairing items faster and more seamless,” Adobe notes in a preview of content-aware fill that it posted at YouTube. “From retouching to completely reimagining an image, here’s an early glimpse of what could happen in the future when you press the delete key.”

In a recent post at her blog Sharpen, Stella Kramer also wondered about what could happen in the future as a result of content-aware fill. And as you can  infer from the post’s title, “The End of Any Semblance of Reality,” her forecast isn’t very sunny.

Curious to learn more, I invited Stella to expand on her Sharpen piece by writing a guest column for this blog, and she kindly agreed. I’ve pasted her text below, unedited and unabridged.

(I hope it goes without saying that our guest columns, which I’d like to do more of, do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockland Martel. They do, however, reflect our wish to foster discussion in the photo community.)

Also, here’s Adobe’s YouTube preview of content-aware fill:

.

.

.

GUEST COLUMN: STELLA KRAMER ON PHOTOSHOP CS5

What do you want from a photograph?  Do you want to feel an emotion?  Marvel at beauty?  Be informed about something that has happened in the world?  Or maybe it’s all of the above.  But when you look at a photograph do you automatically assume that what you see is what the photographer saw?  I always do.

I can sometimes see where the photographer enhanced the photograph—after all burning and dodging have always been around, and I’m not naïve to think there isn’t some Photoshopping going on.  But I’ve always seen photography as an art, something that requires an eye and an aesthetic and a point of view.

.

If it takes no effort at all to “fix” a photograph, then why even bother to learn how to compose a compelling image?

.

Since watching the sneak demo for Photoshop’s new CS5 (where “content-aware fill” was introduced), I’m worried about what effect it will have on photography of all genres.  If it takes no effort at all to “fix” a photograph, then why even bother to learn how to compose a compelling image?  Why try to develop your own aesthetic if you can just take out all the things you don’t want in the photo in post-production?  Why become a craftsperson through your work?  If the image isn’t to your liking, just use the content-aware fill tool and all your problems will disappear.  If only we could do that in our lives.  That would be something!

I’m not trying to revive the “are photographs truth” argument.  I’d like to think that when I look at a photograph I am looking at what the photographer saw, not what the photographer constructed using Photoshop tools.

With everyone bemoaning the state of the industry now, why is this a great new development?  With a tool like this, truly anyone can make a decent photo.  And if that’s the case, why hire a professional?  I’ve read excited comments about how easy this will make things for photographers.  Is that what this is about?  Why should photography be easy?  Didn’t things become easy when the transition from film to digital occurred?  Now you don’t have to learn how to develop film, or edit contact sheets.  Wasn’t that enough?

How can I trust that a photographer knows how to take a great photo when all “problems” can be disappeared to make everything “perfect”?  I don’t want a perfect world.  That seems idiotic to me.  And it also seems strange that anyone would want their lives to be so simplified that they don’t have to learn composition in order to be a photographer.

As for me, I don’t know how anyone is going to be able to trust photography at all anymore. I know I won’t be able to tell that this has been done to a photograph. So what’s going to stop our history from being completely rewritten, with the photos to prove it!

What’s to stop people from removing critical information from photographs, like a person or a weapon?  If you can remove things so easily from a photograph, what’s to stop people from re-creating events to suit their own purposes?  Do you think the Chinese government wouldn’t want to remove the man who stood in front of the tanks in Tiananmen Square?

Maybe I’m kidding myself to think there has every been reality to begin with. But when I saw this demo, all I could think about was what was going to be taken out of the world, what I wasn’t going to see anymore, and how we’ll all be the poorer because of it. —Stella Kramer

.

.

NYTimes.com design director on the iPad and publication designers

There’s been lots and lots of press about the iPad and what it will or won’t do for the publishing industry. But in the first installment of his new “Interaction” column for Print, debuting in the magazine’s June issue, NYTimes.com design director Khoi Vinh looks at Apple’s highly hyped tablet from a different angle: what this new platform will mean for publication designers.

“While Apple is rightly famous for bringing an uncompromising level of design detail to their devices and platforms, the company has provided the iPad with surprisingly few typographic tools for designers and developers,” Vinh writes in his debut column, titled “Jobs Saves? If the iPad manages to save publishing, that doesn’t mean it’s going to save publishing design.”

“For all its revolution and magic, it still doesn’t offer basic hyphenation or professional-quality justification controls, to say nothing of truly empowering tools for rich typography and layout. As a device for reading content, it will suffice; as a tool for delivering great graphic design, well, it’s not quite the future many designers had hoped for.”

Vinh, who also has his own blog (Subtraction), is a strong, reasoned writer. It’s worth going here to read his column in full.

.

.

New work: Matthias Clamer shoots Tina Fey and Steve Carell for Parade

Date Night opens tomorrow. It’s an action comedy starring Tina Fey and Steve Carell in what I hope will be the first in a series of movies starring these two—I think they make a great screen pair.

It’s a big movie, much anticipated, and no doubt you’ve already seen lots of press on it. Parade magazine, for example, has done a cover story on the duo, photographed by Matthias.

.

Tina Fey and Steve Carell. Photo by Matthias Clamer.

.

Full credits for the shoot: Photos by Matthias Clamer; Carell’s grooming by Rheanne White/See Mgmt and styling by Mindy Saad; Fey’s hair by Guy Bayo, makeup by Richard Dean, and styling by Tom Broecker.

.

Photo by Matthias Clamer.

.

At his blog, Matthias has posted even more Date Night photos (here), plus a portrait of Oklahoma City Thunder guard Russell Westbrook (here), as well as the terrific portrait of British pop star La Roux that you see here…

.

La Roux. Photo by Matthias Clamer.

.

MPA names Best Magazine Advertising Campaigns of the Year

This week, the Magazine Publishers of America announced the finalists for the 2010 Kelly Awards, which honor “agency creative teams and advertising clients whose magazine ad campaigns demonstrate both creative excellence and effectiveness in meeting campaign objectives.”

The selections were made by a panel of 30-plus judges from the big ad agencies. “Judges remarked on the following trends: the welcome return to storytelling in the magazine ads, increased tailoring to specific publications and inventive use of space,” according to the press release. “There was also an overall consensus on the positive shift to print and online integration.

The winners will be announced at an invitation-only reception hosted by RR Donnelley on May 18, in New York.

These are screen shots of the finalists gallery that you’ll find at the MPA’s website (you can view the ads larger there). I just wish they’d also listed the photographer’s name when applicable…

.

.

.

Magazines tout “the power of print” in new campaign

.

As announced in the Wall Street Journal last month, a pro-print campaign spearheaded by five major magazine publishers launched this month. “Magazines: The Power of Print” will deploy ads in close to 100 magazines this year, including People, Vogue, and Ladies’ Home Journal, according to the Journal. The first in the series, which appears in Rolling Stone, features a portrait of Olympic medalist Michael Phelps by our own Jim Fiscus (above) for ESPN The Magazine.

The publishers behind the campaign are Charles H. Townsend, Condé Nast; Cathie Black, Hearst Magazines; Jack Griffin, Meredith Corporation; Ann Moore, Time Inc.; and Jann Wenner, Wenner Media. The agency was Young & Rubicam.

“A lot of us sat back for way too long and listened to all this abuse and said nothing about it,” Wenner told the Journal. “Meanwhile, we sit on top of one of the greatest mediums.”

The publishers also filmed a short video for the campaign:

.

.

I’ve posted the campaign’s official press release after the break. Or you can find it here.

.

Read More »

New work: Jorg Badura shoots mind & body fitness story for Self magazine

The April 2010 issue of Self, which features Grey’s Anatomy star Ellen Pompeo on the cover, offers a workout plan designed to make your mind brighter and your body tighter. “Research shows that sculpting sexy curves may go hand in hand with making you a cleaner, better thinker,” writes Beth Janes in “Get the Body and the Brains.”

Jorg shot the photos for the feature, which are a mix of portrait, lifestyle, and instructional.

.

.

.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,932 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com